 |
|
 |
| Georgia General Assembly |
HBill.html
01 LC 28 0136
Senate Bill
206
By: Senators Hecht of the 34th, Meyer
von Bremen of the 12th, Lee of the 29th and Hill of the
4th
A BILL TO BE
ENTITLED
AN ACT
To amend Article 2 of Chapter 14 of Title 9 of the Official
Code of Georgia Annotated, relating to habeas corpus procedure for persons under
sentence of a state court of record, so as to provide for a statute of
limitations for bringing such actions; to designate where a petition must be
filed when the petitioner is being held by federal or other authorities; to
provide for service; to limit the authority of Georgia courts to order
interstate transfers of prisoners; to provide that a court may consider whether
delay by the petitioner in filing the petition prejudiced the state´s
ability to respond; to provide for other matters relative to the foregoing; to
provide an effective date; to repeal conflicting laws; and for other purposes.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF
GEORGIA:
SECTION 1.
Article 2 of Chapter 14 of Title 9 of the Official Code of
Georgia Annotated, relating to habeas corpus procedure for persons under
sentence of a state court of record, is amended by inserting after subsection
(b) of Code Section 9-14-42, relating to grounds for a writ and waiver of
objection to jury composition, a new subsection (c) to read as
follows:
"(c)
Any action brought pursuant to this article shall be filed within one year in
the case of a misdemeanor, except as otherwise provided in Code Section
40-13-33, or within four years in the case of a felony, other than one in which
a sentence of death, life without parole, or life was imposed,
from:
(1) The judgment of conviction becoming final by
the conclusion of direct review or the expiration of the time for seeking such
review;
(2) The date on which an impediment to filing
a petition which was created by state action in violation of the Constitution or
laws of the United States or of this state is removed, if the petitioner was
prevented from filing such state action;
(3) The date
on which the right asserted was initially recognized by the Supreme Court of the
United States or the Supreme Court of Georgia, if that right was newly
recognized by said courts and made retroactively applicable to cases on
collateral review; or
(4) The date on which the facts
supporting the claims presented could have been discovered through the exercise
of due diligence."
SECTION 2.
Said article is further amended by striking Code Section
9-14-43, relating to jurisdiction of habeas corpus proceedings, and inserting in
lieu thereof the
following:
"9-14-43.
A
petition brought under this article must be filed in the superior court of the
county in which the petitioner is being detained. The superior courts of such
counties shall have exclusive jurisdiction of habeas corpus actions arising
under this article. If the petitioner is not in custody or is being detained
under the authority of the United States, any of the several states other than
Georgia, or any foreign state, the petition must be filed in the superior court
of the county in which the conviction and sentence which is being challenged was
imposed."
SECTION 3.
Said article is further amended by striking Code Section
9-14-46, relating to custody of the petitioner, and inserting in lieu thereof
the
following:
"9-14-46.
Custody
and control of the petitioner shall be retained by the Department of Corrections
or other authority having custody of the petitioner. It shall be the duty of the
department or authority to produce the petitioner at such times and places as
the court may direct, provided that the petitioner is within the jurisdiction
of this
state."
SECTION 4.
Said article is further amended by inserting after
subsection (d) of Code Section 9-14-48, relating to conduct of hearings, a new
subsection (e) to read as
follows:
"(e)
A petition may be dismissed if it appears that the respondent has been
prejudiced in its ability to respond to the petition by delay in its filing
unless the petitioner shows that it is based on grounds of which he or she could
not have had knowledge by the exercise of reasonable diligence before the
circumstances prejudicial to the state
occurred."
SECTION 5.
This Act shall be effective upon its approval by the
Governor or its becoming law without such approval.
SECTION 6.
All laws and parts of laws in conflict with this Act are
repealed.